But you neglected to mention that he was giving US encryption secrets to a foreign 
country, not just information about the nuclear
site, enabling a foreign country to decrypt coded messages that may or may not have 
been top secret.  At any rate, I think that the
real question is "why are some spies given lighter sentences?" rather than why his is 
so harsh.  I think that, in general, spies are
treated far less severely than ever before - treason used to be punishable by death.

Howie

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Dinowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 11:53 PM
Subject: Re: o .. m .. g


> A spy for a friendly country retrieving information held back against treaty is 
>still a spy. But why is he still in the hardest
jail around for 17 years when real spys for enemy countries get out in less than 5?
>
> > A spy is a spy, good intentions aside.  He deserved to go to jail...
> >


______________________________________________________________________
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to