I'd be very interested to see where the numbers came from. It seems to me that there is a lot of very selective presentation of numbers here. I imagine that you can reach similar conclusions if you did a selective presentation of the rates of nose-picking, christian fundamentalism, or radical origami adherents. Its all in how you pick the numbers.
> >Certainly that appears to be the conclusion of the author. I'm allowed to >draw my own conclusion, arent' i? > >> I think it might be interesting to discuss how the type of mentality >> suggested by this article can be so destructive...but there's not much >> point >> in discussing the validity of the article itself. > > >Well, I think the statistics in the article are certainly of interest and >worth discussing. I also think that other peoples viewpoints, even ones >that we think are ridiculous are of interest as well, but maybe thats just >me. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:264907 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
