I think the choice should be, Change or a POW. The whole 'without a clue' thing is really based on various presumptions and opinions. I think both candidates will have a plan, a team of advisors and will carry through on some sort of agenda.
The question is whether the US wants things to proceed as they have, or whether they want things done differently. If they want things done differently then I think there's only one candidate that will do that. And of course, Change brings its own risks,which may not be clearly defined or understood. However, there are many that think maintaining America's present course has well defined,debilitating risks. So its about Change, or pushing ahead the same way things have been for the last 8 years. 2008/8/25 G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Michael Dinowitz < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > All I see of Obama is "Change", not necessarily leadership. But McCain > was > > a > > POW. That's what this election has come down to. Is it better to have > > someone who wants change without a clue how or someone who was a POW > > without > > a clue now? (read it out loud, it sounds better) > > > Put me down for "Change without a clue" a millions times over. > > -- > The flowers smell sweeter > The closer you are to the grave > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:266519 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
