> > Holy crap! I agree with Gel! The whole Obama 'change without a plan' > thing is just a bunch of rhetoric as plans are specific, detailed, and > crafted via top US policy advisers from both sides of the aisle.
You mean the same people who have been crafting the plans till now? So you're saying that no matter who wins it'll be more of the same? > > > As Pat Buchanan has recently noted about McCain, he has foreign agents > as top foreign policy advisers and that scares the crap out of me. > His economic advisers are no better (Gramm). And have you looked as closely as Obama's foreign agents? They scare me more than McCain's do. Bottom line is that if your using advisers as a criteria, Obama is the clear loser (to use your terminology). So I think if someone is voting impartially on plans - not so much the > socialized campaign plans as they always change - but on the plans as > they likely are to become based on selected advisers, then Obama is > the clear winner. So if the plans are not an issue then it's a popularity contest and the most photogenic wins. Looks like Paris's a shoo-in. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:266525 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
