Unhackable doesn't exist. You can always hack the user :) But i get the point you were making. Just being a smart ass.
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > again with Bush? > > ::shrug:: they seem to have the same problem, what can I say? I can't > help it if they are stupid too. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_e-mail_controversy > > > I think criminal stupidity is assuming that professional hackers can't > > get into most things they want to get into. > > Well gee then. Let's not bother with any kind of security safeguards. > > Seriously, do you know how stupid that statement makes you sound? It's > pretty well accepted in network security that very high-level data > integrity and security is possible IF USERS FOLLOW PROCEDURES. Which > Palin seems to have a problem doing. I am an RSA SecureID certified > administrator, Robert, and I work in network security. This is > arguably an expert opinion here. Not an assumption. I dunno if Alaska > uses RSA but the Pentagon probably does. Or should. It's not hackable > unless the user writes the password down or tells it to someone, then > hands over the token as well. > > So unhackable does exist, dude. If people have proper respect for security. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:270157 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
