>> Why is everything said against Obama automatically the truth, Sam?
>
> I never claimed that.

Yes you do, every day.

> I thought we were discussing his associates and
> how that reflects on his character.

I think it actually doesn't reflect on Obama's character to associate
with Ayers, nor do i think it reflects on the character of any of the
other dozens of people that *also* served on the same Board, as Ayers
"crimes" took place 40 years ago, he turned himself in, stated that he
has regrets (whether you care or not), and is no longer a "radical
activist".

There.


>> I judge that you and your Republican allies are attempting to smear
>> Obama with the label of "terrorist by association."
>
> So just discussing his associates is now a smear?

No, repeating the lie that "Obama pals around with terrorists" is the smear.

> What are we allowed to discuss? He is running for president.



>> Sure, you parse
>> out your statement saying you're only trying to point out Obama's
>> "association" with Ayers, not say the Obama *is* a terrorist. Oh no,
>> of course not. But you know that the message will be delivered.
>
> Again I'm more concerned with the fact that none of the people around
> him like America.

None? that's a pretty definitive statement, care to back it up?

> I see a problem with that so I ask questions and discuss. He is
> leading in the polls and I might have to live with him as president. I
> want to know if I will have to cling to guns and religion to survive
> :)

probably. 'cause you know, Obama'll probably turn over the keys to the
country to the t'rrists as soon as he gets in office. Like Kennedy was
going to turn over the country to the Pope when he got elected.

>> Just look at the McCain campaign stop from yesterday, the Senator
>> starts a statement about Obama and someone shouts out "terrorist!"...
>> message delivered to the base I guess.

> You convinced me, talking about Obama's is forbidden, someone in the
> crowd might get the wrong idea. Probably racist to talk about him
> anyway.

I didn't say talking about Obama was forbidden. I said the message
you're sending is loud and clear, the base is hearing "Obama is a
terrorist", and despite your declarations that it's not really what
you meant, that's the message you're sending.


>> And now it looks as though members of your party are also starting to
>> call the charge silly as well. My guess though is that you're going to
>> soon disavow Nelson and the others, care to comment about that?
>>
>
> Who's Nelson?

wow. that was fast.

> Is that the other thread from a state senator that worked on CAC?

Former Republican Rep. yes.

> Called Ayers a radical activist . She's part of the Chicago machine,
> not my party.

She has an "R" after her name, she's a Republican (your party). Oh, of
course, she offers an opinion different than that of the GOP talking
points, i guess you're free then to say she is not one of "yours."

got it. Message clear. Differing opinion, not tolerated in GOP. Toe
line, stay in formation.

> Nice try though.

nice attempt at an evasion.


-- 
will

"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:272903
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to