most not... feed... trolls

dammit

how did we go from "none of the people around him" like america

to

"his wife"

hmm

I know I am bringing logic to a stupid fight, but still....

argh. Closing email client now, losing IQ points reading this stuff
and I have too much to do anyway...



On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 1:19 PM, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I never claimed that.
>> Yes you do, every day.
>
> I guess you need to better understand the debate process.
>
>> I think it actually doesn't reflect on Obama's character to associate
>> with Ayers, nor do i think it reflects on the character of any of the
>> other dozens of people that *also* served on the same Board, as Ayers
>
> I do. Especially considering the objective.
>
>> "crimes" took place 40 years ago, he turned himself in, stated that he
>> has regrets (whether you care or not),
>
> His regret was that he didn't do more!
>
>> and is no longer a "radical activist".
>
>  He was a terrorist. Now he's motivating children to become radical activist.
>
>> There.
>
> Yeah!
> :)
>
>>> So just discussing his associates is now a smear?
>>
>> No, repeating the lie that "Obama pals around with terrorists" is the smear.
>
> What part is the lie? He doesn't pal around with Ayers or Ayers is not
> a terrorist.
>
>>> Again I'm more concerned with the fact that none of the people around
>>> him like America.
>>
>> None? that's a pretty definitive statement, care to back it up?
>
> Got me, I forgot his wife likes America now :P
>
>> probably. 'cause you know, Obama'll probably turn over the keys to the
>> country to the t'rrists as soon as he gets in office. Like Kennedy was
>> going to turn over the country to the Pope when he got elected.
>
> You missed the point of the discussion. I think he's leaning towards
> socialism not terrorism.
> Maybe he's been using all these people and will ignore them when in
> power. I can hope.
>
>> I didn't say talking about Obama was forbidden.
>
> As long as it's positive.
>
>> I said the message
>> you're sending is loud and clear, the base is hearing "Obama is a
>> terrorist", and despite your declarations that it's not really what
>> you meant, that's the message you're sending.
>
> That's a ridiculous argument. So I can't mention he's worked with a
> terrorist because one guy in the crowd will assume he's also a
> terrorist? That's why politicians are cautious about who they
> associate with. You never know what people will think.
>
>> She has an "R" after her name, she's a Republican (your party). Oh, of
>> course, she offers an opinion different than that of the GOP talking
>> points, i guess you're free then to say she is not one of "yours."
>
> So are you and Byrd on the same page? He's national.
>
>> got it. Message clear. Differing opinion, not tolerated in GOP. Toe
>> line, stay in formation.
>
> You're rambling.
>
>> nice attempt at an evasion.
>
> No evasion here.
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:272927
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to