Gruss holds Bush accountable for everything. No compromise, no thought of delegation, no thought of his political opponents doing wrong. Only Bush. I have problems with that. I'm a publisher. I'm ultimately responsible for everything I publish. I have an editor in chief (2 actually), both of whom have responsibilities to interface with the writers. One of them is under contract and the other is my wife. So that's now one level away from me. We have editors also under contract who mostly communicate with the editors in chief. Another level away from me. We have writers who are under contract who mostly deal with the editors. I can go on and on but the bottom line question is - if someone down the line violates their contract without me or other people down the line knowing about it, who's the blame? The person who did the violation or me? I'm not absolving myself of responsibility but there is no way I'm going to accept that I, my wife, or anyone else down the line to the violator has SOLE accountability. That's the problem here.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What *about* accountability and leadership. I think Gruss' point is > that we don't see much of those from Bush. For what it is worth I > agree, and Gruss and I don't agree on much. > > > Accountability. Leadership. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:273352 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
