On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Scott Stroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > The oddest part of the game is trying to answer, "Who deserved to win
> that
> > game?"
> > The Giants, were overall, more effective than the Steelers.  But the
> > Steelers absolutely dominated the 3rd quarter.  The NY Def really put on
> > their big boy pants in the 3rd qt just to be able to hang in despite
> being
> > on the field for so long.
> >
> > The team that scored the most points deserved to win.
>

I would agree with that.

I remember a few years back after a Giants/Eagles game.  I think the Giants
fumbled 5 times (and turned it over all 5, but still won).  An Eagles fan
posted to the Giants newsgroup that a team that turns the ball over 5 times
doesn't deserve to win.

My response was, "does a team that forces 5 turnovers but still score fewer
points deserve to win?"

One of the few online discussions that I think I actually won.

If a team plays like shit but still comes out with more points, it generally
means that at some point during the game they played well enough to overcome
the parts of the game where they played like shit.

-- 
I have failed as much as I have succeeded. But I love my life. I love my
wife. And I wish you my kind of success.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:276880
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to