Sorry, I do not see your point.  You are saying that to prove the Democrat
did nothing wrong we shold take the word of a left leaning newspaper?


On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > Scott wrote:
> >>
> >> "the media" as judged by the NYT has investigated and found no hard
> >> evidence of anything other than random work-related events.
> >>
> >
> > When tryign to prove a point, you may want to use less biased sources.  I
> > mean, even the most staunch republicans won't use Fox News as 'proof' of
> > anything.
> >
>
> My point was EXACTLY to use a media channel that is felt to be biased
> such as the NYT.
>
> Why?
>
> Because the charge is that "the media", of which the NYT would
> certainly be included, is not investigating Obama as they should.
>
> My point refuting that assertion is simple and 2 fold:
>
> (1.) It's called the "news" because it's things that are new; new
> things or news.  The Ayers charge isn't new, it's old.  There's
> nothing new and no reason to investigate.
>
> (2.) The assertion that there is reason is false since we can say with
> 100% certainty that multiple stakeholders have investigated this
> charge for 2 years and found nothing.
>
> Therefore the media is correct to leave any mention of Ayers as an
> "olds" rather than a "news".
>
> If we all agreed that, for example, Fox News or the McCain campaign
> *probably* hadn't investigated and therefore the, say, NYT has an
> imperitive to investigate, then I'd be wrong.
>
> But I think we'd all agree that Fox News has probably spent a
> considerable amount of $$$ investigating the Ayers thing and found
> nothing.
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:276926
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to