> Scott wrote: > ....see your point. Don't really see how it rebuts Roberts point, but I see > your point. >
Let's try an analogy: (A.) Let's say Robert claims his child is getting a crappy education at the local public school. (this is equivalent to claiming, say, the NYT is not investigating what it should). That's a subjective accusation. (B.) How would we objectively determine if Robert is right? We could pick a common test, have all the kids in the state take it, and compare scores. (this is equivalent to "testing" the MSM on the Ayers investigations) (C.) Let's say when all of the kids take the test, they all score 10 out of 12, including Robert's kid. (this is equivalent to all investigations turning up not-a). What can we conclude? That all kids are equally knowledgeable on the test content. (that NYT discovered nor more than anyone else.) So we've objectively refuted the accusation through comparative analysis of similar efforts. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:276951 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
