I would totally back that. I have a problem with the simple possession of anything being illegal, it's what you do with something that is bad.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 2:34 PM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: questions from the gun control thread > > No laws regarding the ownership of guns, not their usage. > Laws about how you use guns and what the result of their > usage is does not infringe on the amendment. I'm all for > that. You can own a gun, you can carry a gun, you can make > love to a gun, but once you fire it you are bound by laws > beyond the constitution which may result in a fine, > imprisonment, or even death. > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What interpretation? > > > > I have yet to read one that makes sense in English other than the > > government can create NO LAWS regarding guns, it's a right of the > > people. > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:280068 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
