Wrong, you can deny the rights of individuals after they have been found guilty of a felony crime.
Therefore you could argue that a background check is just to ensure that you are legally entitled to own the firearm, and I have no problem with that so long as it's a shall issue law, meaning that if they have no felonies than the person MUST sell the gun to the individual. > -----Original Message----- > From: Vivec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 1:35 PM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: questions from the gun control thread > > This means that the government cannot even make laws that > restrict guns from convicted criminals and murderers. > Government cannot require registration, licensing or even > background checks. > > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Loathe > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> What interpretation? > >> > >> I have yet to read one that makes sense in English other than the > >> government can create NO LAWS regarding guns, it's a right of the > >> people. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:280050 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
