But it does not say that 'people, who are not convicetd criminals and pass a background check', it just says 'people'. Who's to say that they meant this limitation?
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wrong, you can deny the rights of individuals after they have been found > guilty of a felony crime. > > Therefore you could argue that a background check is just to ensure that > you > are legally entitled to own the firearm, and I have no problem with that so > long as it's a shall issue law, meaning that if they have no felonies than > the person MUST sell the gun to the individual. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vivec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 1:35 PM > > To: cf-community > > Subject: Re: questions from the gun control thread > > > > This means that the government cannot even make laws that > > restrict guns from convicted criminals and murderers. > > Government cannot require registration, licensing or even > > background checks. > > > > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Loathe > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> What interpretation? > > >> > > >> I have yet to read one that makes sense in English other than the > > >> government can create NO LAWS regarding guns, it's a right of the > > >> people. > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:280051 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
