> Michael wrote: > Having the opinion of not wanting gay marriage != tyranny.
But it does. Here's why: Your point is essentially that people should be able to vote on whether we suppress another's rights. That's tyranny of the majority by definition. Look it up in any Oxford dictionary. But if you'd like softer example: If it's ok for a majority of people to vote away someone's choice of marriage partner, on principle it would also be ok for a majority to vote away a citizen's travel rights. So Newfies are nuts right? So how about if the majority of Canada voted that Newfies couldn't FLY to cities in Canada. They could drive, but not fly. So it's not that they can't travel, they just by law can't travel by air because they're Newfies. By you principle, that'd be just fine. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:280973 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
