The *rumor* is that RJR and Phillip Morris are geared for production as 
soon as marijuana is legalized, there is also *speculation* that they 
are cultivating and engineering their own crops already.

LRS Scout wrote:
> There are tobacco farmers down here with land just waiting to be allowed to
> grow cannabis.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Judah McAuley [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 2:53 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Smoking non-tobacco products (was Re: states rights)
>
>
> I'm fine with people using chewing tobacco products. The health risks
> are well understood now and communicated. 20, 30 years ago the tobacco
> industry was still actively suppressing any research that might let
> people know the real harm involved in their products. So long as
> research about products are allowed to be free and the companies
> making those products aren't lying to their customers then I'm good.
>
> As for marijuana, I don't think that it has as much big business
> potential. People don't tend to smoke as much pot as tobacco (most
> people at least). You won't find many 3 packs of joints smokers out
> there. Secondly, it is much more difficult to grow your own tobacco
> than it is your own pot. Marijuana is a weed and grows easily all over
> the place. Combine those two things and I think it makes it likely to
> be more of a boutique business than tobacco. There would be some large
> scale businesses out there I'm sure, especially in the R&D genetics
> side of things. That is already a fascinating area. But down on the
> personal consumption part, I just don't see marijuana developing
> companies the size of RJ Reynolds.
>
> Judah
>
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 11:40 AM, C. Hatton Humphrey <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>   
>>> No one minds people smoking tobacco at home (away from their kids), or
>>> outside (but not near me).
>>>
>>> It isn't any of my business.
>>>       
>> The problem with you response is that it's internalized.  I asked how
>> society would view it.
>>
>> Today we have people that want to tell smokers where they can and
>> can't smoke.  We fund anti-smoking campaigns with tax dollars from the
>> general fund and yet we fund cancer research with cigarette sales tax
>> money.  States have sued tobacco companies and won or settled based on
>> medical issues that arise from smoking.
>>
>> If non-tobacco products were "legalized" in all 50 states would that
>> not lead to the commercialization of such products?  Might it not lead
>> to the same cycle as the tobacco industry fell into, where over the
>> course of 50 years smoking went from glamorized to demonized?
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:287347
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to