I never mentioned a 'perceived government conflict of interest' (that was Jerry) nor do I think anything I have said could be construed as 'outrage'.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Gruss Gott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > ChuckG wrote: > > when were we talking about scott's principles or religion? and how do > > either of those have anything to do with the justification of "but the > > previous administration did it" ? > > > > 1.) I offered no justification for anything, nor agreed that there was > anything to offer justification for. > > 2.) Scott mentioned a perceived government conflicts of interest > principle that I don't recall hearing any outrage at prior to January. > > 3.) I'm trying to understand why Scott's outrage has shown itself only > since January, and was speculating that it's either because he has no > principle there, or is religious about party over principle. > > All caught up? > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:287553 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
