It sucks that you are in that position, it really does.

However, buying real estate is an investment. As with any investment, there
is risk involved. I have no problem with allowing a re-fi at a lower rate
(we are currently in the process of doing so), but I do not think the re-fi
should be for 'market value'. Then instead of a risk/reward, its kind of
like reward/reward.

I guess what pisses me off most is that provision to 'reward' anyone who
gets assistance if they keep up with their payments for a year.  What about
those people who continue to pay their mortgage without gov't assistance?

Also, I do not know if there is a better solution.  So, this could very well
be the best of the bad choices.  Doesn't mean I have to like or agree with
it.

Lastly, I would say that the stories shared by Rasta and Maureen woudl fall
under the part of my original post where I said 'I know not everyone is in
that category'.

On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 1:04 AM, Rastafari <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> that would work, if and only if it came with re-appraisals to fair
> market value...
> and if everyone just took a deep breath and we started over again.
>
> its what ive been saying since day one to my friends and family
>
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:49 AM, Gruss Gott <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Scott wrote:
> >>
> >> I am sorry, but it feels to me like those in need of help from the
> >> president's plan are getting rewarded for their own stupidity for buying
> >> more of a house than they could afford.
> >
> > Buy that man a Stroz.  I gotta agree with you mostly (although
> > somethings gotta be done even if it ain't perfect:
> >
> http://www.thestreet.com/story/10464786/1/todays-outrage-obama-housing-plan-gets-panned.html
> > ).
> >
> > And even though I think Jim Cramer is moron ("I learned wall st terms
> > in my short experience there, now I'll yell them at you") who says
> > wrong shit just about every time I watch him, I do like his plan given
> > the 30 seconds of analysis I've given it.
> >
> > He basically says to give every American the ability to refi at some
> > rate like, say, 4% and then to extend payments for those that need it
> > (40 year, 50 year).  He's presenting it tomorrow to someone or other
> > who sounded important.
> >
> > Anyway, that seems like the most egalitarian approach but I suppose
> > the real question is efficacy.
> >
> > If Obama is convinced his plan stops the bleeding faster even though
> > it's wrongly incented, then I'll trust him for now.
> >
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:289234
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to