>So your solution is to basically tax people, even those who did not want a >union to begin with?
So those who do not want to be in the union get to enjoy the benefits it provides without paying for it? Like wage and benefits negotiators, etc. Isn't that the welfare you keep harping about? Why should that minority get something without paying for it. Besides their dues are not going to the union but to a charity. What have you got against charities? A rand solution is equitable. Everyone pays the same dues, those who do not want to be in the union aren't in it, but they do have to pay for the minimal union benefits. > >My biggest issue with unions is that they tend to promote an adversarial >system where they try to pit labor against management. I am not saying it is >only from the union side, but from my experience it was initiated from the >union side. It also tends to pit pro-union vs anti-union people from within >labor, I have experience with this as well. In most of my experience with unions, its usually been the other way around, after the union was voted in the company became very hostile. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:293028 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
