> > Larry wrote:
> > What I was saying is I'm waiting for him to use actual data rather 
> than fables or anecdotes.
> >
> 
> You're really asking for data to prove that people are greedy?  Ok,
> sir, I submit to you ... THE HUMAN BEING!

a single person is meaningless. Because of the variation between persons a 
single person's response is meaningless. Unless you're doing a lot of 
measurements over time its worse than useless.

> 
> Do you even realize that Judah's point is that all doctors are
> benevolent do-gooders willing to work for a smile and a hug?  If you
> need data to prove that theory wrong then you're an idiot.


You know shit about statistics, even less than what they are teaching in high 
school. 

> 
> I find it ironic that your answer to everything is "give it to the
> government" and then you accuse everyone else of being faith-based.

Have I ever said that about healthcare yet. I've made comparisons between 
health care systems. 

Besides when I say faith based you seem to miss an important point. When 
someone bases their opinion on hearsay or anectdotes without any empirical 
evidence then that is faith based.  When it is based on hard data then that is 
something else entirely, and deserves careful and detailed consideration. When 
its something "I heard" or "Everyone knows" or "They say" or "X happened to the 
best friend of my brother in-law's second cousin twice removed" then it is not 
worth the paper such hear say is written on.

> 
> You might want to consider your own misplaced faith in government
> which, by the way, happens to be made up of human beings.

In terms of health care, I think the government has had a better record than 
the private industry.  Cut the idiotological pardon ideological crap and look 
at things without the blinders, which system covers more people? Which system 
covers the person who is working a minimum wage job, or the student putting 
themselves through college by working at the same time.>

> 
> What are you going to say next?  That the Federal Reserve is a
> benevolent organization only committed to our happiness?  Because
> they're all economists, right?
> 
> Hey, I've got data, fed economists don't make that much.  That must
> mean the fed acts in our best interests.

That is simply bullshit try some real arguments based on facts instead of the 
bullshit.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:296680
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to