Well that depends on what network you are listening to of course. Since we are forced to watch all three (Fox, CNN and PMSNBC) here, I tend to focus more on the first one. I do listen to Rachel Maddow though because she is absolutely hilarious. She needs to be on Last Comic Standing. And Keith Olbermann and his countdown, yeah, that guy is pretty funny to, especially with his deadpan humor he calls news. I will perform due diligence though and read all of the feeds, separate the bias from the truth and figure out what is what. But the common theme with both stories so far is that it does seem the typical "oh woe is me, I am black so I need special concessions" crap. So I say again, if a black man can aspire to the highest public office in America, it is proof that anyone can be anything they want to be, it is more a matter of personal choice rather than circumstance.
Dana wrote: > I can agree that "fair" does not always mean proportionate numbers. > Apart from that tho I don't think I know enough about the issues of > the case to decide whether I agree with this particular decision. For > instance, were the scores of minority candidates the only basis for > saying the test was not fair? > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:299215 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
