Ok..so you don't know what the first line means either. And that is apparently the argument which sets the tone for his entire rebuttal. Therefore...you don't really understand what he's saying either. And no I wasn't making fun of his editor, I really wanted to see if you understood what the guy was saying. Especially since you are agreeing with his rebuttal.
When you say he is not defending Goldman Sachs, that's all I care about. If he is basically agreeing that they are corrupt and shoulder a lot of blame for this and past financial crises, then Taibbi being an asshole is irrelevant. 2009/7/14 Sam <[email protected]> > > I'm seeing double. > > Are you making fun of his Editor? > > He's not defending GS, he's just saying Taibbi's an asshole. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:300166 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
