I hate to bring this up, but I think #3 is actually part of #1, therefore your post consists of only four questions. This means your post is now 20% less effective. Remember to adjust for this when making your "Me vs Sam" pie chart.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Gruss Gott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Sam wrote: > > If they were to complicated to understand and value how could they > collapse? > > It was a bet on housing and the housing market failed. No mystery is > > what I believe he's saying. > > > > But that avoids the entire questions of: > > (1.) Should they have been able to bet? Did they have a role in > allowing themselves to bet? > > (2.) Did they rig the market with other sides bets/schemes? > > (3.) Did they have a role in the policy that allowed the bets? > > (4.) Should there have been regulation and did they have a role in > preventing regulation? > > (5.) Did they know their bets would collapse the market? > > The reason you think it's simple is because you don't understand it. > > It's people like you that wish my wife wouldn't have talked us out of > staying in banking. > > For some reason people absolutely LOVE giving their money to bankers. > They even defend their theft. > > It's the best grift in the World! Look at Sam - he doesn't think he's > been ripped off enough yet. > > Did you know GS underwrites their bets with your tax dollars? Still? > > Of course you didn't. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:300183 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
