> Sammy wrote: > As stated, the Rolling Stone article had the facts wrong.
What're you, Judah now? His point is directionally correct in the top percentile. We've got a Goldmanie Mac quasi-company in business, that's funded by the US tax payer. And last year if you worked at Goldman the compensation averaged across the employees comes to $1M/employee. Do you think tax payers should fund this quasi-government company? Should tax payers guarantee the wages of Goldman employees? Cause if you pay taxes, that's what you're doing: funding Goldman's profits and paying for their losses. That was his point. And if you're comfortable giving Goldman people money, I'm sure they won't turn down your check. And, oh, they're probably manipulating the market right now to drive YOUR company out of business, but they'll take a bunch of money out first. THEN you'll be fired. It's the Goldman way. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:300497 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
