On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Gruss Gott<[email protected]> wrote: > > His point is directionally correct in the top percentile. We've got a > Goldmanie Mac quasi-company in business, that's funded by the US tax > payer.
Now facts don't matter as long as the conclusion is close? > And last year if you worked at Goldman the compensation averaged > across the employees comes to $1M/employee. Make me want to be a democrat, or at least friends with powerful ones. > Do you think tax payers should fund this quasi-government company? > Should tax payers guarantee the wages of Goldman employees? No, I think I wanted AIG to crash and burn. Banking would have corrected itself without taxpayers throwing billions to political cronies. > Cause if you pay taxes, that's what you're doing: funding Goldman's > profits and paying for their losses. I was never defending Goldman, I was just mocking RS and their so called facts:) > That was his point. If he used real facts his point would have meant something. > And if you're comfortable giving Goldman people money, I'm sure they > won't turn down your check. Your drifting:) > And, oh, they're probably manipulating the market right now to drive > YOUR company out of business, but they'll take a bunch of money out > first. It's the green thing to do. > THEN you'll be fired. > > It's the Goldman way. Capitalist pig ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:300500 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
