Naw, good scientists love a good disproving. There aren't as many good scientists as you'd think tho.
Most are just... people. ... But that may be the beer talking. Pardon my french, but where the fuck is Jim? Here, just aliased? Assuming Jim wasn't an alias, of course... -- Sarcasm I now see to be, in general, the language of the devil; for which reason I have long since as good as renounced it. Thomas Carlyle On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Scott Stroz<[email protected]> wrote: > > But don't you then run the risk of only looking for that which > validates your theory rather than that which disproves it? > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Gruss Gott<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Scott wrote: >>> >>> Dude, you sound like Russle Crowe in 'A Beautiful Mind', in that hazy >>> area between genius and lunatic. >>> >> >> I can't take credit for the concept, but it is the product of geniuses: >> >> "For example, I use the hard skills and a data-driven approach to >> solve problems and strategic issues. But I also continue to adopt >> Bain's "gut check" and "answer-first" approach, which helps me form an >> initial hypothesis and then let the data validate or disprove it." >> >> http://www.bain.com >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:300555 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
