You said your 'medical profile' woudl indicate to a doctor not to give you the vaccine. Does this mean that 'medical profile' is that in 1976 30 people died?
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Gruss Gott <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Mary Jo wrote: >> Even *if* either of these statements is true (of course, you don't provide >> links to any actual scientific data to support it since there is none) > > I did provide the links: > > http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/11/03/What-We-Have-Learned-About-the-Great-Swine-Flu-Pandemic.aspx > http://web.mac.com/rblaylock/Russell_Blaylock_M.D./Swine_Flu_Data.html > > And in 1976 thirty people died and 500 were crippled and that's why I > can't get the vaccine; because those people died. > > Now granted many people have no (obvious) problem with things like > squalene, but many do and some die. > > So isn't the real question whether or not the risk justifies injecting > people with a potentially harmful substance? > > I don't think it does, but here's another question: > > Can you explain specifically how this new untested H1N1 vaccine is > materially different from the 1976 version? > > In December 1976 it was decided that the vaccine was more dangerous > than the flu it was trying to prevent. > > Do you think that was a bad call? > > And either way, what criteria are you using to justify injecting > people with these substances? > > Here's more info: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1976_Flu_Outbreak > > The 1976 swine flu outbreak, also known as the swine flu fiasco, or > the swine flu debacle, was a strain of H1N1 influenza virus that > appeared in 1976. > > Alarmed public-health officials decided that action must be taken to > head off another major pandemic, and they urged President Gerald Ford > that every person in the U.S. be vaccinated for the disease. The > vaccination program was plagued by delays and public relations > problems, but about 24% of the population had been vaccinated by the > time the program was canceled. > > There were reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome, a paralyzing > neuromuscular disorder, affecting some people who had received swine > flu immunizations. One of the causes of this syndrome could be a rare > side-effect of modern influenza vaccines, with an incidence of about > one case per million vaccinations.[2] As a result, Di Justo writes > that "the public refused to trust a government-operated health program > that killed old people and crippled young people." In total, less than > 33 percent of the population had been immunized by the end of 1976. > The National Influenza Immunization Program was effectively halted on > December 16. > > Overall, about 500 cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), resulting > in death from severe pulmonary complications for 25 people, were > possibly caused by an immunopathological reaction to the 1976 > vaccine[citation needed]. Other influenza vaccines have not been > linked to Guillain-Barré syndrome, though caution is advised for > certain individuals, particularly those with a history of GBS.[3][4] > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:307064 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
