Except that CF supports x++ ;) I'm sorry - but 90% of the apps out there are "query a db and show crap", and for that, record sets are the most RAD imho. Not every site needs ORM and OO. ;)
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[email protected]> wrote: > > strings and collections are objects :) > > however the comparison of how easy it is to query a recordset from the db is > an outdated standard to go by. You could easily say since that "i++" is a > lot easier than "cfset i = i + 1" and therefore say that cf is harder to > increment a counter var. :) > > > On Nov 28, 2009, at 3:58 PM, Raymond Camden wrote: > >> >> Objects aren't necessarily the best answer for every situation. >> Hibernate understands this and provides support for working with >> non-objects where it makes more sense (like simple collections of >> strings, etc). >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Who works in recordsets anymore? It's all about the objects nowadays. >>> Even databases are gettinv on the bandwagon. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On Nov 27, 2009, at 12:52 PM, "Scott Stewart" >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:308632 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
