90% of the cars on the road run on only gasoline. Does that mean that gasoline is the best way of running a car or does it mean that it's a legacy effect?
The newer apps I've been seeing are relying less on relational databases for their storage so querying a recordset becomes less important. On Nov 28, 2009, at 4:08 PM, Raymond Camden wrote: > > Except that CF supports x++ ;) > > I'm sorry - but 90% of the apps out there are "query a db and show > crap", and for that, record sets are the most RAD imho. Not every site > needs ORM and OO. ;) > > On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> strings and collections are objects :) >> >> however the comparison of how easy it is to query a recordset from the db is >> an outdated standard to go by. You could easily say since that "i++" is a >> lot easier than "cfset i = i + 1" and therefore say that cf is harder to >> increment a counter var. :) >> >> >> On Nov 28, 2009, at 3:58 PM, Raymond Camden wrote: >> >>> >>> Objects aren't necessarily the best answer for every situation. >>> Hibernate understands this and provides support for working with >>> non-objects where it makes more sense (like simple collections of >>> strings, etc). >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Who works in recordsets anymore? It's all about the objects nowadays. >>>> Even databases are gettinv on the bandwagon. >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> On Nov 27, 2009, at 12:52 PM, "Scott Stewart" >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:308633 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
