I have looked at the emails and no, they didn't cover up anything though I suppose I could have missed something, I did not read them all. The ones commonly trotted out as damning have been explained in context, which the stolen and released emails lack. Not that selective release of stolen material would ever imply that someone might have an agenda.
Judah On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 4:33 AM, Robert Munn <[email protected]> wrote: > > You posted two messages, which took WAY more than 2 seconds, ergo you are an > idiot. :-) > > Take a look at the leaked emails. These people have spent years stifling > dissent, they refuse to share their methods, and they claim that the other > side isn't practicing sound science. What a bunch of clowns. > > > On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Gruss G wrote: > >> >> > gg wrote: >> > The truth is that anyone who's giving this story more than 2 seconds >> > of thought is an idiot >> >> FYI, it took me 1.8 seconds to find the raw data: >> >> ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ghcn/v2/ >> >> > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:308677 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
