The only news sources that have claimed these emails have come from a whistle blower has been conservative oriented publications, such as the Washington Examiner and the Washington Times.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Selective release? >> The emails were sent to the BBC, then uploaded and never published on >> realClimate.com and a few other US sites. Finally released in Russia >> and China. > > My understanding is that the emails sent to the BBC and elsewhere do > not generally contain all the emails in the various exchanges between > parties. I could be wrong however. > >> Are you sure they were hacked and not released by a whistle blower? > > Everyone I've seen thus far involved with the emails has considered it > a hack. If it was a whistle blower, no one has yet to come forward > publicly or even anonymously. > >> How about "Mike's Nature trick" or "Hide the Decline"? > > Explained by Michael Mann: > http://www.examiner.com/x-10722-Austin-Science-Policy-Examiner~y2009m11d25-Climatolgist-Michael-Mann-responds-to-CRU-hack > > I'm sure you won't believe him of course but it has what those emails > do not: context. > > Judah > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:308712 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
