On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > Selective release? > The emails were sent to the BBC, then uploaded and never published on > realClimate.com and a few other US sites. Finally released in Russia > and China.
My understanding is that the emails sent to the BBC and elsewhere do not generally contain all the emails in the various exchanges between parties. I could be wrong however. > Are you sure they were hacked and not released by a whistle blower? Everyone I've seen thus far involved with the emails has considered it a hack. If it was a whistle blower, no one has yet to come forward publicly or even anonymously. > How about "Mike's Nature trick" or "Hide the Decline"? Explained by Michael Mann: http://www.examiner.com/x-10722-Austin-Science-Policy-Examiner~y2009m11d25-Climatolgist-Michael-Mann-responds-to-CRU-hack I'm sure you won't believe him of course but it has what those emails do not: context. Judah ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:308687 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
