On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]> wrote: > My understanding is that the emails sent to the BBC and elsewhere do > not generally contain all the emails in the various exchanges between > parties. I could be wrong however.
You are correct, but the file was uploaded in full to realClimate.org and a few other US sites where it was removed immediately. > Everyone I've seen thus far involved with the emails has considered it > a hack. If it was a whistle blower, no one has yet to come forward > publicly or even anonymously. Don't hackers usually brag? He only left one message and no claims: http://noconsensus.wordpress.com/2009/11/13/open-letter/#comment-11917 >> How about "Mike's Nature trick" or "Hide the Decline"? > > Explained by Michael Mann: > http://www.examiner.com/x-10722-Austin-Science-Policy-Examiner~y2009m11d25-Climatolgist-Michael-Mann-responds-to-CRU-hack Funny how Jones said he didn't know what Hide the Decline meant. The "divergence problem" is the same as Hide the Decline. Still not science. > I'm sure you won't believe him of course but it has what those emails > do not: context. The emails have context, that's why it was sifted and put together in a huge package. Unlike something a hacker would know how or care to do. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:308701 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
