The emails show there was no consensus, Jones was controlling all the reviews.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am not so sure I agree with you completely. > > The fact that these boneheads broke the law does not automatically > invalidate any of their research, but it sure does bring a lot of > their work into question. If the 'scientific consensus' is based, even > in part, on some of their work, then the consensus itself is > questionable. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:311292 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
