Wasn't that an internal investigation by ACORN? I'm o surprised they found nothing wrong.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote: > > I need a definition of "the ACORN stuff" but an investigation failed to find > broken laws. I tend to believe the claim of deceptive editing, but that case > has not yet been made in court. Short answer: Probably. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:311356 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
