a grain, yes, but I don't think it can be characterized as a whitewash. In other words, I think that I believe that the group did not break laws. Not implementing reforms fast enough also sounds plausible; they seem pretty scattered and disorganized.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]> wrote: > > It was not an internal investigation but it was commissioned by ACORN. > It was performed by Scott Harshbarger, former Attorney General for > Massachusetts. > > The report did find a number of things wrong. In particular, it faults > ACORN for not implementing reforms fast enough after an alleged 8 year > coverup of by the founder of embezzlement by his brother. > > > http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/07/AR2009120703985.html > > Obviously, however, a report commissioned by the group itself should > be taken with a grain of salt. > > Judah > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Wasn't that an internal investigation by ACORN? I'm o surprised they > > found nothing > > wrong. > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> I need a definition of "the ACORN stuff" but an investigation failed to > find > >> broken laws. I tend to believe the claim of deceptive editing, but that > case > >> has not yet been made in court. Short answer: Probably. > >> > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:311361 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
