a much more simple explanation is that you are avoiding the discrete stimuli that trigger a behavioral response. Or take it one step higher, you avoid those situations or cues that can trigger those cognitions beliefs and emotions that lead to additive behavioral responses.
Why bother with an overly complex and difficult to measure construct when something far more simple provides a better explanation of the data? On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Cameron Childress <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]> wrote: >> Ok, then what about situations which are less clear cut. What about >> advertising alcohol to people that you have reason to believe are >> alcoholics? The alcoholic is still making the decision to buy and >> consume the alcohol, but do the people pushing it have any >> culpability? > > One of the fundamental things you are taught as an addict is to avoid > situations that feed your addiction, including not being around > alcohol, drugs or the triggers that may influence your addiction. > This is fundamentally an instruction on how to use your own free will > and ability to shape and control your environment in order to lead to > a specific desirable long term outcome. > > -Cameron > > ... > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:312478 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
