I think that's how it should be. Parties should be allowed, but people should have to run as individuals, and be able to articulate their own positions and plank, without the aid of staff or a telepromter.
-----Original Message----- From: G Money [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 8:17 AM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Surprise, Surprise. Tea Party leaders prove to be dangerous AND stupid On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:28 PM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote: > > Not a bad idea. > > I guess, longer term, I would like to see a new party formed so that a > great many people can run on similar issues, honesty, integrity, and > constitutional constructionist ideals. > > While one person can help, many could bring it all back to what it should > be. > That's a good idea, but keep in mind just about ALL political parties start out with this ideal. Once you start bringing in more and more people...purity of ideas kind of goes out the window. That's why I like the independent label. I don't have to answer for anyone else's stupid ideas, even others who declare themselves independents...because we don't pretend to share a certain platform. We are just that...independent. -- Everybody knows the war is over Everybody knows the good guys lost ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:314571 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
