I agree 100%. That SHOULD have been the reaction. On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Vivec <[email protected]> wrote:
> > That's fine, and understandable. > > But somewhere along the operation, things seem to have drifted from > the rules of engagement to something else totally. > > In my view the only correct response from the Military would be to > START by saying,"Listen...our guys broke the ROE...they f***ked up. > We're looking into ways to stop this from happening again. We're > having guys go through retraining, refamiliarisation with our > ROEs...new oversight.." whatever.If it should not have happened, and > if the Military actually thinks that its a problem...then act that > way. > > However, if the Military thinks it is just collateral damage, tough > nuts sucks to be them,think of all the soldiers that have died...then > I guess they don't really need to do or say anything. > > One should remember though that the Military force ultimately exists > to serve the civilian populace. > The ROE exists for a reason. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:315157 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
