If that were so, we would see the state of Kansas trying to insert Creationism into the curriculum. Evolution as a theory or Creationism as a theory can be correct, not both. You accept one or the other...these are 2 diametrically opposed theories because with Creationism, there is only room for what the bible literally says.
Eric -----Original Message----- From: Sam [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 2:00 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: FW: Evolution, Big Bang Polls Omitted From NSF Report I didn't say they don't exist, just that they don't make up the masses. I see we're back to evolution vs creation again. I believe if worded correctly you'd find most accept both. But that's just my opinion. On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> wrote: > > classic logical fallacy. Argument from > silence(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_silence). Since you > have not seen it it doesn't exist. > > Just look at the survey numbers, over a third of all respondents in > various national polls decry evolution and advocate a biblical version > of how humanity came to be. > > You're arguing the classic black swan argument. ie I've never seen a > black swan so they do not exist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:315463 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
