Meh, thinly veiled guilt trip. You don't need to do an ultrasound to make a
woman informed about child birth and abortion.



On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Jerry Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> It is clear that the intention of the ultrasound law is intended to add
> levels and layers of additional guilt on women who plan on getting an
> abortion. Not simply to "make them more informed".
>
> I don't necessarily agree with that, but I don't see that it is any way
> illegal. And in some ways, I agree with the intent.
>
> In theory, the more a woman knows, the more likely she is to make an
> informed decision.
>
> So, how on earth does that reconcile with the second law, which makes
> doctors immune from any lawsuits for withholding or even purposefully lying
> to a woman (or man) about the health of their baby?
>
> It is that second bill that is just evil.
>
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Sandra Clark <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm all for that.  So Oklahoma should amend its laws to include at the
> very
> > least: vasectomies and penile implants.
> >
> > "If men had to go through Mammograms, they would definitely have invented
> a
> > less painful way to screen for Breast Cancer"
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 6:43 AM, G Money <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > But an abortion IS a medical procedure. Any and all patients should
> know
> > > EXACTLY what is about to happen during ANY operation. I know that I
> > > demanded
> > > this before all of my operations.
> > >
> > > Do I think it's necessary to point out organs or any of that crap,
> > NO...but
> > > a detailed description of what the doctor is about to do....can only be
> a
> > > GOOD thing. As a patient choosing an elective surgery, you should have
> > ALL
> > > the facts....including what is about to get removed, and how.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > This post is about abortion. This will be unlikely to change anyones
> > > > mind one way or another and there isn't much in the way of discussion
> > > > to be had at this point. But sometimes it is important to go on
> > > > record, stating your desire to kick every one of the legislators who
> > > > voted for these bills in the nads.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/28/us/28abortion.html?hp
> > > >
> > > > I would like to go on record.
> > > >
> > > > That is all.
> > > >
> > > > Judah
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:316843
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to