I dont have time to argue abortion with angry white men. Gruss is that you?

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Medic <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I should clarify.
> No, you may not ask.
>
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Medic <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> No.
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Brian Thornton 
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Might I ask who that has responded has been to a abortion clinic?
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Medic <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Meh, thinly veiled guilt trip. You don't need to do an ultrasound to
>>> make a
>>> > woman informed about child birth and abortion.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Jerry Johnson <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >> It is clear that the intention of the ultrasound law is intended to add
>>> >> levels and layers of additional guilt on women who plan on getting an
>>> >> abortion. Not simply to "make them more informed".
>>> >>
>>> >> I don't necessarily agree with that, but I don't see that it is any way
>>> >> illegal. And in some ways, I agree with the intent.
>>> >>
>>> >> In theory, the more a woman knows, the more likely she is to make an
>>> >> informed decision.
>>> >>
>>> >> So, how on earth does that reconcile with the second law, which makes
>>> >> doctors immune from any lawsuits for withholding or even purposefully
>>> lying
>>> >> to a woman (or man) about the health of their baby?
>>> >>
>>> >> It is that second bill that is just evil.
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Sandra Clark <[email protected]>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I'm all for that.  So Oklahoma should amend its laws to include at
>>> the
>>> >> very
>>> >> > least: vasectomies and penile implants.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > "If men had to go through Mammograms, they would definitely have
>>> invented
>>> >> a
>>> >> > less painful way to screen for Breast Cancer"
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 6:43 AM, G Money <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > But an abortion IS a medical procedure. Any and all patients should
>>> >> know
>>> >> > > EXACTLY what is about to happen during ANY operation. I know that I
>>> >> > > demanded
>>> >> > > this before all of my operations.
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > Do I think it's necessary to point out organs or any of that crap,
>>> >> > NO...but
>>> >> > > a detailed description of what the doctor is about to do....can
>>> only be
>>> >> a
>>> >> > > GOOD thing. As a patient choosing an elective surgery, you should
>>> have
>>> >> > ALL
>>> >> > > the facts....including what is about to get removed, and how.
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Judah McAuley <
>>> [email protected]
>>> >> > > >wrote:
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > This post is about abortion. This will be unlikely to change
>>> anyones
>>> >> > > > mind one way or another and there isn't much in the way of
>>> discussion
>>> >> > > > to be had at this point. But sometimes it is important to go on
>>> >> > > > record, stating your desire to kick every one of the legislators
>>> who
>>> >> > > > voted for these bills in the nads.
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/28/us/28abortion.html?hp
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > I would like to go on record.
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > That is all.
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > Judah
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:316860
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to