I do think there should be a penalty assessed when you get hacked and it is
because you have a weak password.  Imagine how many IT headaches that would
solve.

I think the moral of the story is that if you are going to do something that
is illegal...make sure you use a strong passwords and a good encryption
scheme....or at least one good enough to stop a teenager ;-)

Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: Medic [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 9:36 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Palin email hacking case - guilty!


Well, kind of. You could say the lid on the mailbox is akin to a weak
password on your email. However it's kind of a moot point.

The common argument here, and one which you seem to be parroting is the
"don't be surprised if..." argument. This I think loses the plot a bit here
as I don't think anyone is arguing about being surprised about the email
getting hacked with a weak-ass challenge response. However whether a turn of
events is surprising or unexpected doesn't make the crime any more or less a
crime.

On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Eric Roberts <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
> That's even a bad analogy.  The mail box isn't locked and cant be (or how
> else does mail get in), while your email is supposed to be secured.  If
you
> want to stick to the snail mail analogy, then maybe a PO box and you leave
> your key hanging on the box at the post office.  But again, if you don't
> secure thing and you leave it wide open, don't be surprised when someone
> comes it.  Not leaving it secured is akin to putting a neon sign over it
> and
> saying come on in...especially if you are a public figure.
>
> Eric
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Medic [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 5:54 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Palin email hacking case - guilty!
>
>
> I don't really think comparing it to breaking into a house is a very good
> analogy. I think it's probably more accurate to equate it to taking mail
> out
> of someone's mail box. I believe this is a felony. And if someone did it
> you
> would blame the victim by saying "well the mailbox wasn't even locked."
>
> I think it sucks that some kid who guesses a password gets time, but it's
a
> crime and a massive, premeditated invasion of privacy. We need to protect
> that privacy, especially now as we're losing more and more of it.
>
>
>
>
> 



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:317196
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to