> 1.  yes
Give a source. No source that I've read says that the IDF took part in
the massacre. If you have a different source, show it. The Kataeb
Party was not the IDF or under IDF control in any way, shape or form.

> 2.  Doesn't matter...he was in charge
That wasn't the question. Was he present? No. Him being in charge is
handled in #4

> 3.  Since he was in charge...that would mean that he gave the order unless
> they were just an anarchistic mob...
Chain of command. He sets the policy which is implemented down the
line. If you're claiming he ordered it, show your source. The Kataeb
Party was not in his chain of command nor were any of the other
Lebanese groups.

> 4.  If you think that he didn't give the order as Defense minister then you
> are just naive as I know you are not stupid.
Same as above. Show your source or it's just an inflammatory statement
with no basis in reality.

> 6.When Israel does good, then yes.  But I see Israel does no wrong in your
> eyes....never.  I sure hope you are getting rewarded for making excuses for
> their criminal actions.
I'll defend Israel against peoples tendency to instantly leap and
accuse but I'll back up what I say with references to avoid just the
label your applying. On the other hand, I've been very critical of the
Israeli government in the past. Even this topic had me saying how
foolish the operation was and how heads will roll for it.

You want more criticism. The current defense minister will not be
sacked as he's happily carrying out Washington's orders. He'll skate
by and his subordinates will get the brunt of it. As with Sharon, he's
ultimately responsible for the actions of his subordinates and should
be held to the same standards.

Bottom line is that if you make the type of inflammatory claims that
you do, prepare to back them up.

> 1. Did the IDF or any Israeli take part in the massacre? No.
> 2. Was Sharon present? No.
> 3. Did Sharon order it? no
> 4. Was he, as the defense minister, ultimately responsible for what
> happens during his tenure, even if he is not directly responsible?
> According to Gruss, Yes.
> 5. Did you actually read about the subject before accusing the IDF of
> carrying out the massacre? No
> 6. Can Israel ever do anything right in your eyes? No
>
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Eric Roberts
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Was there not a massacre?  An Israeli committee determined  that?
>> LOL...Sharon could have been raping little girls and they would have said
> he
>> was only indirectly involved.  That's a bit like letting the fox guard the
>> henhouse.  Hardly a lie.  The only lie is the excuses you make up for
>> Israel's misconduct and criminal act
>
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:320293
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to