Btw, I just looked up Mike Williams and it seems he stepped down as head of the Tea Party Express. That is certainly a positive development but the points are still valid for purposes of discussion.
Cheers, Judah On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm sorta there with you. The difference is that I'm not sure what > group Al Sharpton is a leader of. If Al Sharpton was the recognized > leader of "Racebaiters for Christ" or something then I would say that, > yeah, that group is going to be painted (both good and bad) by the > actions and words of Al Sharpton. Maybe Al Sharpton thinks he speaks > for me, I don't know. But I can say that I'm not a member of a group > he heads. The example I gave, of the Tea Party Express and its leader > Mike Williams, is an actual group with membership that raises and > spends money for political purposes. It would be like if Al Sharpton > became President of the NAACP and politicians were taking NAACP money > and the NAACP was organizing events for them. In that case, would it > be fair to make judgements about the NAACP and the candidates they are > involved with based on the groups choice of President? I'd say that > that isn't unreasonable. > > Cheers, > Judah ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:325902 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
