>From the Wiki thqt sam posted...

Relation to 2008 financial crisis
See also: Subprime mortgage
crisis<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subprime_mortgage_crisis> and
Global financial crisis of
2008–2009<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_financial_crisis_of_2008%E2%80%932009>

Some economists, politicians and other
commentators[*who?<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Avoid_weasel_words>
*] have charged that the CRA contributed in part to the 2008 financial
crisis <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_financial_crisis> by encouraging
banks to make unsafe loans. Economists, including those from the Federal
Reserve <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve> and the
FDIC<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FDIC>,
dispute this contention. The Federal Reserve, having examined the evidence,
holds that empirical research has not validated any relationship between the
CRA and the 2008 financial
crisis.[100]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Reinvestment_Act#cite_note-KrosznerSpeech-99>At
the FDIC, Chair Sheila Bair delivered remarks noting that the majority
of
subprime loans originated from lenders not regulated by the CRA, calling it
a "scapegoat" and declaring it "NOT
guilty."[101]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Reinvestment_Act#cite_note-bair1208-100>

Economist Stan Liebowitz wrote in the *New York Post* that a strengthening
of the CRA in the 1990s encouraged a loosening of lending standards
throughout the banking industry. He also charges the Federal Reserve with
ignoring the negative impact of the
CRA.[95]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Reinvestment_Act#cite_note-Liebowitz-94>In
a commentary for
CNN <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNN>, Congressman Ron
Paul<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Paul>,
who serves on the United States House Committee on Financial
Services<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_Committee_on_Financial_Services>,
charged the CRA with "forcing banks to lend to people who normally would be
rejected as bad credit
risks."[102]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Reinvestment_Act#cite_note-101>In
a Wall
Street Journal <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wall_Street_Journal> opinion
piece, Austrian school
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austrian_school>economist Russell
Roberts <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell_Roberts_%28economist%29> wrote
that the CRA subsidized low-income housing by pressuring banks to serve poor
borrowers and poor regions of the
country.[103]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Reinvestment_Act#cite_note-102>

However, many others dispute that the CRA was a significant cause of the
subprime crisis. 2008 Nobel Prize in
Economics<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Memorial_Prize_in_Economic_Sciences>winner
Paul
Krugman <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Krugman> states that the notion
"has been refuted up, down, and
sideways."[104]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Reinvestment_Act#cite_note-103>He
also noted in November 2009 that 55% of commercial real estate loans
were
currently underwater, despite being completely unaffected by the
CRA.[105]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Reinvestment_Act#cite_note-104>According
to Federal
Reserve <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve> Governor Randall
Kroszner <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randall_Kroszner>, the claim that
"the law pushed banking institutions to undertake high-risk mortgage
lending" was contrary to their experience, and that no empirical evidence
had been presented to support the
claim.[100]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Reinvestment_Act#cite_note-KrosznerSpeech-99>In
a Bank
for International
Settlements<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_for_International_Settlements>(BIS)
working paper, economist Luci Ellis concluded that "there is no
evidence that the Community Reinvestment Act was responsible for encouraging
the subprime lending boom and subsequent housing bust", relying partly on
evidence that the housing bust has been a largely exurban
event.[106]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Reinvestment_Act#cite_note-Ellis-105>Others
have also concluded that the CRA did not contribute to the financial
crisis, for example, FDIC <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FDIC> Chairman
Sheila 
Bair,[101]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Reinvestment_Act#cite_note-bair1208-100>Comptroller
of the Currency John C. Dugan,
[107]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Reinvestment_Act#cite_note-106>Tim
Westrich of the Center
for American Progress<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_American_Progress>
,[108]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Reinvestment_Act#cite_note-107>Robert
Gordon of the American
Prospect 
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Prospect>,[109]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Reinvestment_Act#cite_note-108>Ellen
Seidman of the New
America Foundation <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_America_Foundation>,[
110] 
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Reinvestment_Act#cite_note-109>Daniel
Gross of
Slate 
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slate_%28magazine%29>,[111]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Reinvestment_Act#cite_note-110>and
Aaron Pressman from
BusinessWeek 
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BusinessWeek>.[112]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Reinvestment_Act#cite_note-111>

Some legal and financial experts note that CRA regulated loans tend to be
safe and profitable, and that subprime excesses came mainly from
institutions not regulated by the CRA. In the February 2008 House hearing,
law professor Michael S. Barr, a Treasury Department official under
President 
Clinton,[67]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Reinvestment_Act#cite_note-statement-66>
[113]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Reinvestment_Act#cite_note-112>stated
that a Federal Reserve survey showed that affected institutions
considered CRA loans profitable and not overly risky. He noted that
approximately 50% of the subprime loans were made by independent mortgage
companies that were not regulated by the CRA, and another 25% to 30% came
from only partially CRA regulated bank subsidiaries and affiliates. Barr
noted that institutions fully regulated by CRA made "perhaps one in four"
sub-prime loans, and that "the worst and most widespread abuses occurred in
the institutions with the least federal
oversight".[114]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Reinvestment_Act#cite_note-Barr-113>According
to Janet L. Yellen, President of the Federal
Reserve Bank of San
Francisco<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_Bank_of_San_Francisco>,
independent mortgage companies made risky "high-priced loans" at more than
twice the rate of the banks and thrifts; most CRA loans were responsibly
made, and were not the higher-priced loans that have contributed to the
current 
crisis.[115]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Reinvestment_Act#cite_note-Yellen-114>A
2008 study by Traiger & Hinckley LLP, a law firm that counsels
financial
institutions on CRA compliance, found that CRA regulated institutions were
less likely to make subprime loans, and when they did the interest rates
were lower. CRA banks were also half as likely to resell the
loans.[116]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Reinvestment_Act#cite_note-115>Emre
Ergungor of the Federal
Reserve Bank of
Cleveland<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_Bank_of_Cleveland>found
that there was no statistical difference in foreclosure rates between
regulated and less-regulated banks, although a local bank presence resulted
in fewer 
foreclosures.[117]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Reinvestment_Act#cite_note-116>

During a 2008 House Committee on Oversight and Government
Reform<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_Committee_on_Oversight_and_Government_Reform>hearing
on the role of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the financial crisis,
including in relation to the Community Reinvestment Act, asked if the CRA
provided the "fuel" for increasing subprime loans, former Fannie Mae
CEO Franklin
Raines <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_Raines> said it might have
been a catalyst encouraging bad behavior, but it was difficult to know.
Raines also cited information that only a small percentage of risky loans
originated as a result of the CRA.

In 2009, The Federal Reserve Banks of Boston and San Francisco published
"Revisiting the CRA: Perspectives on the Future of the Community
Reinvestment Act,"
[118]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Reinvestment_Act#cite_note-117>which
assembles views from a wide range of academic researchers, regulators,
community development practitioners and financial service industry
representatives on how to improve the CRA going forward.


On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Right around this time is when Gruss would remind us all that
> sub-prime mortgages were only a small part of the problem....
>
> He used to annoy the piss out of me at times, but I miss Gruss.
>
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Robert Munn <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Vivec <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Where are you getting your information that these corporations were
> >> 'Forced' into creating this financial crisis?
> >> Are you implying that they bear no responsibility at all in this?
> >>
> >
> > We have covered this before. Time warp back a few years. Democrats
> scolded
> > Fannie and Freddie for not working harder to deliver the dream of home
> > ownership to millions of people who he felt deserved to have the American
> > dream - economics be damned. He forced them to lower their standards and
> > take on many more sub-prime mortgages in pursuit of this policy goal.
> Fannie
> > and Freddie, backed by the American taxpayer, complied. A combination of
> > this policy and the availability of cheap money sent sales soaring,
> creating
> > the housing bubble.
> >
> > Banks saw the flood of easy money and figured they had to jump on the
> > bandwagon or miss out on the profits. You can't blame them for doing what
> > comes naturally to them - trying to maximize shareholder returns. Do they
> > bear any responsibility for the mess? Sure. Like everyone else, they got
> > caught up in the craze and failed to see the fiscal crash they were
> headed
> > toward. They generated so many bad loans in the sub-prime market that
> they
> > put their core businesses in jeopardy of failure.
> >
> >
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:329309
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to