Not a rationalization at all. In war you have the right to target a soldier, helmet and all. Hamas has stated quite clearly time and again that they are at war with Israel. Are you claiming otherwise?
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Eric Roberts < [email protected]> wrote: > > Nice try...next sad rationalization.... It's like saying it's ok to shoot > a > soldier's helmet with a 50 cal but not the soldier himself (as it would be > a > violation of the Geneva Convention. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 08:50 PM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: Israel PM rejects 1967 border proposal. > > > Civilian buildings, not civilian people. As long as you make that > distinction then we have no dispute. Israel did target civilian buildings > used by terrorists. They used to bulldoze the civilian buildings belonging > to terrorists. Buildings, not people. > > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Eric Roberts < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > The difference there is that we never actively targeted civilian > > buildings like the Israelis do. > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:338332 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
