It wasn't a reference to the Nazi's as much as it was a reference to the German people. It's a valid reference to people turning a blind eye to, or making excuses for, atrocities.
-----Original Message----- From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 09:16 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Israel PM rejects 1967 border proposal. Ah, the Nazi reference. This thread is dead and I'm not surprised that you threw it. In war, a military base is a legitimate target. A terrorist base is a legitimate target. Civilians are not legitimate targets. As I've shown time and again, Israel does not target civilians and while civilians might get hurt while fighting terrorists, the civilians are not the target. So what do you think should be done when a terrorist is hiding out in a civilian home, using it to store weapons, or using it as a launching platform to attack others? What about the civilians who are being forced to host the terrorist? On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Eric Roberts < [email protected]> wrote: > > Ummm...no...that is just a really sorry attempt to rationalize war crimes. > I am sure the German people did the same thing in WWII. > > No...it's called terrorizing people. Plain and simple. I would > respond by arresting the people responsible with a police force...not > killing innocent civilians with indiscriminate bombing and rocket attacks. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:338336 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
