And do you really think tripling the trillions already wasted would
have had a different effect?

It goes way beyond logic.

.

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> and it was watered down all to hell. Paul Krugman opposed at the time on the
> grounds that it was not enough to be effective but would be used as proof
> that the concept was flawed. And it seems he was right.
>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:341123
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to