>the term "theory" has a very specific meaning in science. I am not sure >which theory would need more testing. AFAIK it would not be considered a >theory if it did. > >If you're saying that there is a lot out there that we don't understand, >then fine. True. But I think your logic is a little fuzzy too. And no, I >don't quite see the connection between evolution and diabetes... maybe there >is one, but insulin seems more like an example of moden medicine. Which does >use tools it doesn't quite understand, all the time. > >
Insulin from bacteria with recombinant DNA was developed using evolutionary methods and with genetic engineering.. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:342922 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
